|
|
Gite Owners
Topic has 56 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
21/11/2006, 20:17
|
Josephine79
Joined on 07/03/2005
Posts 19
|
|
|
Yes, BUT........ they're in the wrong, you have an eviction order signed by the judge, but that doesn't mean they'll go. They have nothing to lose. Unfortunately if you evict them by force you have plenty to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
21/11/2006, 22:05
|
J.R's gone native
Joined on 16/07/2006
Picardie, Sussex
Posts 2,048
|
|
|
|
One can also make life difficult without cutting off services.
A restrictor in the water supply reducing it to a trickle means that they would have to gather and store water in buckets to use on demand, I believe that this is what General Des Eau does.
I once resolved a situation where the continual tripping of the electrical RCD and my refusal to investigate until the rent was paid was quite effective. A little electrical knowledge and a radio controlled switching relay goes a long way!
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
22/11/2006, 13:01
|
Ariege Auberge
Joined on 28/04/2005
Posts 12
|
|
|
|
Josephine
Your tenants probably still have their old address on their cheques because they are in temporary accommodation - I'm presuming they are not on holiday for 12 months??
I still think that the proof of address is adequate for GITE owners which was the point of your original post. If the owner decides to extend the let beyond the 3 months maximum for tourist accommodation then the tenant has far more rights and is incredibly protected and as you say more checks need to be carried out.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
22/11/2006, 14:05
|
Josephine79
Joined on 07/03/2005
Posts 19
|
|
|
Ariege: what do you mean "temporary accomodation"? They have signed a three year lease. But 12 months in to it they still have their previous address on their cheques. They have doubtless updated their details with the bank and will be receiving bank statements in their present home, but if they have an old cheque book they are entitled to carry on using it. And bearing in mind how few cheques anyone writes these days a chequebook can last for eons.
My point is that an address on a cheque is no form of guarantee that the signatory of the cheque (and your supposedly short term let) actually lives at the place indicated.
Although the gite owner in the case which was the subject of my original post refused to extend the contract for the gite beyond the original fortnight the family just stayed there without paying rent and despite the eviction order obtained against them. The bailiff could do nothing.
A further word of warning. In this case the tenants offered rent for the next month after the end of their "fortnight". The gite owner turned it down because if she had accepted it it would have given them a de facto contract. So they were "occupants sans titre" with a court judgement against them, but when it came down to it they were in the gite and nothing further could be done.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
22/11/2006, 14:08
|
Josephine79
Joined on 07/03/2005
Posts 19
|
|
|
Some nice ideas there J.R. . Unfortunately they are already complaining that they will sue because the electricity is unsafe (it isn't) and threatening to call the police if anyone goes round to try and fix it or anything else ..........
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
22/11/2006, 17:16
|
Chief

Joined on 13/06/2006
Wherever i am today
Posts 312
|
Re: Dodgy tenants
|
|
|
|
|
Josephine79 wrote: | Some nice ideas there J.R. . Unfortunately they are already complaining that they will sue because the electricity is unsafe (it isn't) and threatening to call the police if anyone goes round to try and fix it or anything else ..........
|
|
Pay some heavies, have them moved, and make it clear what the consequences are if they pursue you. It is only my view, but on principle (ie: having worked myself stupid for what i have), i would have them moved. Strip the roof, flood them out, white noise them to death, dig a massive wide trench around the property, ensure they never get to sleep day or night, block all access and egress to the property, and if necessary....well we won't even go there in respect of what i would do if i was angry...do whatever you have to to move them on.......by the time i had finished i would have them begging me to let them leave!!
You might not be responsible for being down, but you are responsible for getting back up again.....
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
23/11/2006, 3:54
|
Fumanzoku

Joined on 23/08/2004
Posts 151
|
|
|
"Pay some heavies, have them moved, and make it clear what the
consequences are if they pursue you. It is only my view, but on
principle (ie: having worked myself stupid for what i have), i would
have them moved. Strip the roof, flood them out, white noise them to
death, dig a massive wide trench around the property, ensure they never
get to sleep day or night, block all access and egress to the property,
and if necessary....well we won't even go there in respect of what i
would do if i was angry...do whatever you have to to move them
on.......by the time i had finished i would have them begging me to let
them leave!!"
Sounds like an average day in (occupied) Palestine. Why not hire a
helicopter gunship Chief? Hover over the house for a few days, strafe
the driveway, drop marines down the chimney... ;)
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
France Forum » Owning/Running ... » Gite Owners » Re: Dodgy tenants
|
|
|
|