|
|
Health
Topic has 44 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
05/03/2008, 18:57
|
Sprogster
Joined on 23/08/2004
Var & C.I.
Posts 359
|
Re: Changes to medical reimbursements on 1 January 08
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to my sister and her husband who are both medical Doctors, broken bones are indeed life threatening, treated or otherwise. Apparently, the major risk arising from a broken bone are blood clots that break away and lead to a lung embolism during the healing process. Sadly, my wife's father died under exactly these circumstances some years ago.
Maybe this is information one would prefer not to know!
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
05/03/2008, 21:09
|
Caussenarde
Joined on 10/11/2007
Posts 69
|
Re: Changes to medical reimbursements on 1 January 08
|
|
|
|
|
Logan,
Are you saying that you have the financial resources to self insure yourself, and presumably conjoint, for 30% of the cost of the worst scenario?
Imagine for example, a very serious road accident. I leave you to estimate the cost of this, hospital, ambulance, post accident treatment, home visits.....
If you are sure you have the liquid funds to cover 30% of the total then fine, you can choose to self-insure.
If you do not, then who exactly do you imagine is going to pay your costs?
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
05/03/2008, 21:13
|
Russethouse

Joined on 23/08/2004
Forum Moderator
Posts 10,144
|
Re: Changes to medical reimbursements on 1 January 08
|
|
|
|
|
Logan, I guess you have already researched that you have the best value mutuelle for your circumstances ?
www.quimperclub.org
99
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
06/03/2008, 8:58
|
Logan

Joined on 23/08/2004
Posts 773
|
Re: Changes to medical reimbursements on 1 January 08
|
|
|
|
|
Caussenarde wrote: | Logan,
Are you saying that you have the financial resources to self insure yourself, and presumably conjoint, for 30% of the cost of the worst scenario?
Imagine for example, a very serious road accident. I leave you to estimate the cost of this, hospital, ambulance, post accident treatment, home visits.....
If you are sure you have the liquid funds to cover 30% of the total then fine, you can choose to self-insure.
If you do not, then who exactly do you imagine is going to pay your costs?
|
|
My point is the CMU in general pay for life threatening treatment in hospital. I have paid to be a part of CMU so I expect value in return. In the senario you describe I would expect the costs to be covered 100% by CMU. Not 100% of the tarif convention but the whole cost, apart from the daily forfait charge. I certainly do not expect anyone else to pay my costs. If I take a risk then it's my risk, period. I am suggesting here that the Mutuelles do not give value for money and you don't necessarily need to subcribe to one to live in France. There is another way. For example a commercial insurer who will cover just hospital costs only which is far cheaper. However common sense tells me that apart from minor aliments anything that requires hospital treatment must be 'life threatening' in nature.
Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori. (Horace).
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
06/03/2008, 10:25
|
Caussenarde
Joined on 10/11/2007
Posts 69
|
Re: Changes to medical reimbursements on 1 January 08
|
|
|
|
|
Logan,
When you leave hospital (after life threatening event or not) you get a 'ticket', ie a bill, which you have to pay.
It represents the amount outstanding after deducting the proportion of the cost covered by CMU in your case, typically this is a bill for 20% of the cost of the hospital treatment.
A person with no Mutuelle or money could present this unpaid bill as a problem to their CMU Caisse as a basis for their need for CMU complementaire.
But a person with sufficient resources, who has apparently declined to insure against this possibility (even a probability) should expect, I suggest, short shrift.
I'll leave you to it now, but you can see the situation for yourself at
http://www.hopital.fr/hopital/vos_demarches/l_hospitalisation/les_frais_d_hospitalisation_et_remboursement
Bon courage, and don't get sick.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
06/03/2008, 10:26
|
Ron Avery
Joined on 29/11/2004
Aveyron 12
Posts 3,393
|
Re: Changes to medical reimbursements on 1 January 08
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I can see the whole basis of Logan's arguement for dropping the Mutuelle is totally flawed.
As far as I can find out there is no differential tarif of charges for medicines its 0.50€ per carton/bottle etc (perhaps Clare can confirm this) there is a differential tariff for other medical "actes" like blood tests and X rays.
The deductions are done in the same way as they deduct 1€ from your reimbursement for a visit to the doctor ie CPAM deducts this from your next reimbursement for doctors, prescription items etc It is different as you don't pay the charge at the chemist at the time, so there is no immediate charge, so its deducted later which is where perhaps the confusion has occurred.
"En pratique, que se passe-t-il à la pharmacie quand j'achète des médicaments ? Le pharmacien me fait-il payer plus cher la boîte ? Non, vous payez le même prix que d'habitude. Le montant de la franchise, 50 centimes, est déduit du remboursement effectué par l'Assurance Maladie pour la boîte de médicaments que vous avez achetée. Par exemple, si vous achetez une boîte de médicaments 10 euros, et que ce médicament est remboursé à 65 %, l'Assurance Maladie vous remboursera 6 euros au final (6,50 € - 0,50 € de franchise).
However, is not getting 0.50c back for a box of pills grounds for dropping your mutuelle? I have had a reimbursement from my Groupama Mutuelle for everything on a prescription at the chemists that was covered by the CMU, but there has always been are a number of medicines and other items like elastic bandages that are not reimbursable by CPAM and that list is ever growing, more were added in January2008. So is it CPAM not reimbursing you or your mutuelle? If the latter, change your Mutuelle.
Why not post a sensible answer, people will appreciate it more
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 4 of 5 (45 items)
|
< 1 2 3 4 5 > |
|
|
|
France Forum » Living » Health » Re: Changes to medical reimbursements on 1 January 08
|
|
|
|