|
|
Health
Topic has 40 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
11/05/2008, 9:08
|
Logan

Joined on 23/08/2004
Posts 731
|
Re: Is top-up health insurance really necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
sweet 17 wrote: | |
I don't think you realise that some of us don't "cost" out everything and want our money back just because we have paid.
As with contributions to the NHS, I was happy to pay and not use the service. Can you not see that, to paraphrase Oscar Wilde, you might know the cost of everything and the value of nothing?
To me, there is an intrinsic value and justice in paying into a pot and then drawing out only the amounts that I need. I'd rather pay, enjoy good health and let other poor souls benefit from the money that I have paid in and do not want or need.
|
|
Well sweet 17 you are entitled to be generous to others with your resources if you wish. I support personal choice in all things. I also like the principal that France allows us to choose if we have a mutuelle or not. The country is a very high tax society and seeking value for the disposable part of our income is for me a priority. Contributing to the profits of assurance companies is not.
The 'value of anything' is very much a subjective principle. I value self help and incentive and taking responsibility for our own lives. The government is responsible for the health of the nation through the large slice of taxation we already pay. A mutuelle is just in reality more taxation which you don't really need to pay. It is not the same as house insurance or any other risk cover.
Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori. (Horace).
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
11/05/2008, 10:17
|
Keith CHANNING

Joined on 22/11/2007
northern Puy-de-Dôme
Posts 52
|
Re: Is top-up health insurance really necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/05/2008, 13:57
|
Patf
Joined on 23/08/2004
SW Gers
Posts 2,131
|
Re: Is top-up health insurance really necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
Logan - the example of the heart attack. The cost was covered only 70%, for some reason. Possibly because it was done via SAMU, not the medecin traitante. The hip replacement was covered 100%.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
11/05/2008, 19:48
|
NormanH
Joined on 10/04/2008
Posts 179
|
Re: Is top-up health insurance really necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
Patf wrote: | | Logan - the example of the heart attack. The cost was covered only 70%, for some reason. Possibly because it was done via SAMU, not the medecin traitante. The hip replacement was covered 100%. |
|
I have already stated that I believe Logan's premise that 'life threatening' conditions are automatically covered at 100% to be incorrect. This seems to back that up. I stand to be corrected if someone can quote from the http://www.ameli.fr/ site where Logan's idea is stated.
If I am right it tips the balence of the argument back the other way if you might have to meet 20% of a serious operation and aftercare
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
12/05/2008, 9:55
|
Logan

Joined on 23/08/2004
Posts 731
|
Re: Is top-up health insurance really necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
My understanding is that the consultant in charge of a particular case of hospitalisation will certify the condition to be either life threatening or not. This then is related to the percentage the state will fund. It's hard to imagine a heart attack case not being regarded as life threatening. However when it comes down to a particular doctors opinion, differences are inevitable.
Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori. (Horace).
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
12/05/2008, 15:01
|
osie
Joined on 17/12/2007
South West France
Posts 62
|
Re: Is top-up health insurance really necessary?
|
|
|
|
|
The pro's and ***'s of life insurance is something that has gone round and round in my mind for years, much of which has been already discussed in the previous messages.
My summary is that mandatory insurance is generally worth it as if the country has deemed it mandatory that it probably is a good idea.. i.e. house insurance
Other insurances play on the fears of people and sometimes those people benefit financially and most times they are for the comfort factor... all good reasons to take it out.
My opinion is that it is better to put money aside rather than to give it to a profit making company to put on their side. However, this normally simple task is quite tricky for most. Therefore insurance companies exist... and the world goes round.
p.s. I have not yet got a top-up although I regularly re-access the variables.
thanks osie
www.le-murier.com
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 (41 items)
|
< 1 2 3 4 5 > |
|
|
|
France Forum » Living » Health » Re: Is top-up health insurance really necessary?
|
|
|
|