The Complete France Post Bag

Topic has 223 replies.

Print Search
Sort Posts:    
   09/05/2008, 15:15
Russethouse is not online. Last active: 30/09/2008 20:46:31 Russethouse



Top 10 Posts
Joined on 23/08/2004
Forum Moderator
Posts 10,140
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
The report button was always there....
www.quimperclub.org

99
   Report 
   09/05/2008, 15:19
Dick Smith is not online. Last active: 28/11/2008 21:01:49 Dick Smith



Top 10 Posts
Joined on 23/08/2004
Surrey and Manche (Pays Mortainais)
Posts 8,914
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
Why do I sense waves of hostility here?

Regards

Dick Smith

Nowhere is there warmth to be found
Among those afraid of losing their ground
   Report 
   09/05/2008, 15:45
Benjamin is not online. Last active: 09/10/2008 07:05:12 Benjamin

Top 100 Posts
Joined on 21/08/2005
Vendée South
Posts 1,815
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
 Russethouse wrote:
The report button was always there....


And it works. Thank you Moderators.




Benjamin

St Malo 1-New evidence suggests mis-trial
   Report 
   09/05/2008, 16:00
Deby is not online. Last active: 15/08/2008 22:10:59 Deby



Top 500 Posts
Joined on 23/08/2004
Posts 641
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote

Just thought I would add - my thread seems to have been hi-jacked.  I didnt see the joke thing which is being referred to here.The subject to which I am referring to is what I have noticed across all subjects. An example would be the LHD thread - someone asked whether a  company was worth dealing with.  This was responded with a reminder of be aware of naming and shaming.  My point is by saying someone is not reputable is or not recommended is certainly not naming and shaming. I would also welcome what other posters think, not just Moderator bias. Clarification on this point would be helpful by the Moderators once they have listened to other posters opinions.

Deby


http://www.chateau-de-clerac.com
   Report 
   09/05/2008, 16:10
raindog is not online. Last active: 27/10/2008 11:39:51 raindog



Top 500 Posts
Joined on 26/09/2007
HERAULT
Posts 796
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
b*gger - as usual I seem to have missed all the fun.....

sociability is just a big smile and a big smile is nothing but teeth
   Report 
   09/05/2008, 16:10
Jacqui      Too            is not online. Last active: 30/09/2008 19:24:17 Jacqui Too



Top 500 Posts
Joined on 23/08/2004
Shropshire / Dordogne 24
Posts 710
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
 Deby wrote:

This Forum is losing its way.  We can only say good things about companies/people but we cannot  say not so good things!!! Oh please be sensible, by saying someone is not good or not recommended is not naming and shaming.

The Forum needs to have a balanced view. Otherwise everything is Disneyland and not real life.  People get shot down for offering this here. The Forum should offer balanced opinions.

What do others think?

Deby

I agree with you Deby, but I think that there is a need in some posters to try and tip that balance with snide, abusive comments used only to provoke and annoy.

There was a post this morning that was 'pulled' while I was reading it, just another abusive rant from someone hiding behind a user name, I have no idea what went on after that as I was getting on with my other life Woot! [:-))]

I found that post offencive and again last night someone using degrading remarks about a certain group of people that the poster knew would offend many on this forum.

I think balance is what the mods try to keep (but they are only humanWhistles [Www]) If posters use civilised conversation then then I think there is no reason why most things should not be discussed.


Jackie


   Report 
   09/05/2008, 16:41
Russethouse is not online. Last active: 30/09/2008 20:46:31 Russethouse



Top 10 Posts
Joined on 23/08/2004
Forum Moderator
Posts 10,140
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
 Deby wrote:

Just thought I would add - my thread seems to have been hi-jacked.  I didn't see the joke thing which is being referred to here.The subject to which I am referring to is what I have noticed across all subjects. An example would be the LHD thread - someone asked whether a  company was worth dealing with.  This was responded with a reminder of be aware of naming and shaming.  My point is by saying someone is not reputable is or not recommended is certainly not naming and shaming. I would also welcome what other posters think, not just Moderator bias. Clarification on this point would be helpful by the Moderators once they have listened to other posters opinions.

Deby

I think you really do have to take that up with Forum Admin or Archant. Whether someone is reputable or not, is often a matter of opinion. If you had a bad experience with a customer and they posted x,y and z about you, it may not be unreasonable for you to feel aggrieved. I don't think Archant have, or want to have the resources to get into any sort of refereeing role, nor be sued for defamation etc, so there is a blanket rule to protect the company and other people too. 


www.quimperclub.org

99
   Report 
   09/05/2008, 17:37
Quillan is not online. Last active: 01/12/2008 20:02:50 Quillan



Top 25 Posts
Joined on 23/08/2004
Forum Moderator
Posts 3,911
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
I seem to remember the naming and shaming rule has been around for years. The way it used to be circumnavigated as it were was not to mention the name just what had happened "Builder took the money, didn't do the work and we have never seen him since" sort of thing. A brief one liner was left at the end by the poster along the lines of "If you want more details, name of person/company etc then please contact me by PM". That way there would be nothing that could get Archant drawn in to any form of litigation. Perhaps we should continue along those lines.
http://www.chambresdhote.com

   Report 
   09/05/2008, 18:01
Judith is not online. Last active: 23/10/2008 17:28:09 Judith

Not Ranked
Joined on 01/02/2006
Posts 295
Re: Balanced Forum
Reply Quote
 Quillan wrote:
I seem to remember the naming and shaming rule has been around for years. The way it used to be circumnavigated as it were was not to mention the name just what had happened "Builder took the money, didn't do the work and we have never seen him since" sort of thing. A brief one liner was left at the end by the poster along the lines of "If you want more details, name of person/company etc then please contact me by PM". That way there would be nothing that could get Archant drawn in to any form of litigation. Perhaps we should continue along those lines.


Sensible suggestion - let's see if that stops some of the very rude comments which have been getting more frequent.  I agree that it should be possible to let enquirers know of any problems that others have experienced, and as the law of libel (or is it the other one when its written - sorry, been a long day, can't remember what it's called!) is not something anybody wants to get involved in, I suggest reminders of the possibility of "pm's" is flagged when needed.

Judith
ex W1 and now in the Aude

   Report 
  Page 2 of 25 (224 items) < 1 2 3 4 5 > ... Last »
France Forum » General Discuss... » The Complete Fr... » Re: Balanced Forum

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems

Please note that any unsolicited advertising will be removed