Driving

Topic has 18 replies.

Print Search
Sort Posts:    
   07/05/2008, 10:46
trees 2 is not online. Last active: 28/04/2008 09:16:23 trees 2

Not Ranked
Joined on 28/04/2008
Posts 64
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote
 Dick Smith wrote:
 trees 2 wrote:
Amazing, isn't it? Call the cops to report a burgalry etc, get a crime number, and usually, no visit.Sad [:(]

Flip one of their Scameras the bird, etc, and they'll chase you to the ends of the earth.




I really don't want to live in a society in which people are allowed to choose which laws they observe and which they don't...


And what law, pray, forbids rude gestures at a CAMERA?

   Report 
   07/05/2008, 11:12
Sunday Driver is not online. Last active: 25/06/2008 14:12:23 Sunday Driver



Top 50 Posts
Joined on 07/10/2005
Deux Sevres (79)
Posts 2,747
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote

Try this one...

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, it is an offence to indecently expose oneself. Indecent exposure is defined as someone, male or female, exposing their genitals intending another person to see them and thereby to cause alarm or distress to them. The offence is covered by section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, with the maximum penalty being imprisonment of two years.

The rude gesture in question occurred in a public place (on the highway) and the deliberate downward displacement of the individuals underpants is likely to have exposed the  genitals at some point.  The fact that a camera was present is immaterial.

Wink [;-)]

 


Waddya mean it's only Saturday......
   Report 
   07/05/2008, 13:26
Phil & Pat is not online. Last active: 21/06/2008 11:15:47 Phil & Pat

Not Ranked
Joined on 24/12/2006
Falaise, Calvados (14)
Posts 95
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote
 Sunday Driver wrote:

...is likely to have exposed ... 

Wink [;-)]

 




Can you be prosecuted for a likelihood in the UK now?

   Report 
   07/05/2008, 15:35
trees 2 is not online. Last active: 28/04/2008 09:16:23 trees 2

Not Ranked
Joined on 28/04/2008
Posts 64
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote

 



Well you can be prosecuted for NOT knowing who wasa driving a car registered in your name, so I suppose anything is possible.

How on EARTH this shower have managed to uproot one of the basic tenets of British justice, (innocent until proven guilty), I'll NEVER understand.

Probably did it the same way as they keep applying retrospective legislation.........




   Report 
   11/05/2008, 12:18
Cathy is not online. Last active: 13/05/2008 17:50:34 Cathy



Top 75 Posts
Joined on 07/03/2006
Mostly near Bordeaux; Sometimes near Bristol
Posts 1,684
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote

Was the passenger just getting changed for the office in the front seat?  Whistles [Www]

 


Cathy
-----
Your children won't remember you ironing their pyjamas but they will remember you reading them a bedside story.
   Report 
   11/05/2008, 14:37
powerdesal is not online. Last active: 28/06/2008 08:19:45 powerdesal



Top 75 Posts
Joined on 07/01/2006
Sharjah U.A.E
Posts 2,010
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote
Assuming, for the pupose of argument, that he was getting changed, he was not wearing a seat belt which is certainly an offence for him and possibly for the driver also, for allowing a passenger to travel without a seat belt fastened.

Either way, he gets done.

Steve
Sharjah + 50 (in France)
...........................................................................

Roll on death.....Demob is too far away.
   Report 
   11/05/2008, 15:59
Sunday Driver is not online. Last active: 25/06/2008 14:12:23 Sunday Driver



Top 50 Posts
Joined on 07/10/2005
Deux Sevres (79)
Posts 2,747
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote
 trees 2 wrote:

Well you can be prosecuted for NOT knowing who wasa driving a car registered in your name, so I suppose anything is possible.


Not quite.

The registered keeper of the vehicle who does not provide details of the identity of the driver commits an offence - unless he shows to the satisfaction of the court that he did not know and could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained who the driver of the vehicle or, as the case may be, the rider of the cycle was.

 


Waddya mean it's only Saturday......
   Report 
   11/05/2008, 16:29
allanb is not online. Last active: 12/02/2008 21:54:40 allanb

Top 500 Posts
Joined on 04/09/2006
Posts 438
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote
 Sunday Driver wrote:
In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, it is an offence to indecently expose oneself. Indecent exposure is defined as someone, male or female, exposing their genitals intending another person to see them and thereby to cause alarm or distress to them. The offence is covered by section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, with the maximum penalty being imprisonment of two years.

SD: I thought that "mooning" consisted of exposing the backside; this is borne out by the photograph that accompanied the original post, in which the alleged offender's genitals are modestly concealed.

However, I yield to your superior knowledge, in these as in other matters.

   Report 
   11/05/2008, 17:53
Jonzjob is not online. Last active: 18/06/2008 21:53:02 Jonzjob



Top 50 Posts
Joined on 23/08/2004
Nr Carcassonne, 11
Posts 2,524
Re: Not French drving, BUT...
Reply Quote

I ask the question again, how do you identify the miscreant?

The police have a boat load of mug shots, but I wonder how large their collection of the other cheek shots is??

Confused [8-)]

 

 


John.

The only difference between the men & the boys
is the size & the shape & the price of their toys!!
   Report 
  Page 2 of 2 (19 items) < 1 2
France Forum » Living » Driving » Re: Not French drving, BUT...

Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems

Please note that any unsolicited advertising will be removed