|
|
The Complete France Post Bag
Topic has 223 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 15:19
|
Dick Smith

Joined on 23/08/2004
Surrey and Manche (Pays Mortainais)
Posts 8,731
|
|
|
Why do I sense waves of hostility here?
Regards
Dick Smith
Nowhere is there warmth to be found Among those afraid of losing their ground
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 15:45
|
Benjamin
Joined on 21/08/2005
Vendée South
Posts 1,564
|
|
|
Russethouse wrote: | | The report button was always there.... |
|
And it works. Thank you Moderators.
Benjamin
Snips, snails and puppy dog tails
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 16:10
|
raindog

Joined on 26/09/2007
HERAULT
Posts 761
|
|
|
b*gger - as usual I seem to have missed all the fun.....
sociability is just a big smile and a big smile is nothing but teeth
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 16:10
|
Jacqui Too

Joined on 23/08/2004
Shropshire / Dordogne 24
Posts 616
|
|
|
Deby wrote: | |
This Forum is losing its way. We can only say good things about companies/people but we cannot say not so good things!!! Oh please be sensible, by saying someone is not good or not recommended is not naming and shaming.
The Forum needs to have a balanced view. Otherwise everything is Disneyland and not real life. People get shot down for offering this here. The Forum should offer balanced opinions.
What do others think?
Deby
|
|
I agree with you Deby, but I think that there is a need in some posters to try and tip that balance with snide, abusive comments used only to provoke and annoy.
There was a post this morning that was 'pulled' while I was reading it, just another abusive rant from someone hiding behind a user name, I have no idea what went on after that as I was getting on with my other life ![Woot! [:-))]](/cs/images/emotions/w00t.gif)
I found that post offencive and again last night someone using degrading remarks about a certain group of people that the poster knew would offend many on this forum.
I think balance is what the mods try to keep (but they are only human ) If posters use civilised conversation then then I think there is no reason why most things should not be discussed.
Jackie
At least with a spell-checker I can appear somewhat educated!
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 17:37
|
Quillan

Joined on 23/08/2004
Forum Moderator
Posts 3,576
|
|
|
I seem to remember the naming and shaming rule has been around for years. The way it used to be circumnavigated as it were was not to mention the name just what had happened "Builder took the money, didn't do the work and we have never seen him since" sort of thing. A brief one liner was left at the end by the poster along the lines of "If you want more details, name of person/company etc then please contact me by PM". That way there would be nothing that could get Archant drawn in to any form of litigation. Perhaps we should continue along those lines.
http://www.chambresdhote.com
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 18:01
|
Judith
Joined on 01/02/2006
Posts 211
|
|
|
Quillan wrote: | | I seem to remember the naming and shaming rule has been around for years. The way it used to be circumnavigated as it were was not to mention the name just what had happened "Builder took the money, didn't do the work and we have never seen him since" sort of thing. A brief one liner was left at the end by the poster along the lines of "If you want more details, name of person/company etc then please contact me by PM". That way there would be nothing that could get Archant drawn in to any form of litigation. Perhaps we should continue along those lines. |
|
Sensible suggestion - let's see if that stops some of the very rude comments which have been getting more frequent. I agree that it should be possible to let enquirers know of any problems that others have experienced, and as the law of libel (or is it the other one when its written - sorry, been a long day, can't remember what it's called!) is not something anybody wants to get involved in, I suggest reminders of the possibility of "pm's" is flagged when needed.
Judith W1 and Aude
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 18:45
|
puppycloud
Joined on 09/05/2008
Posts 16
|
Re: Balanced Forum
|
|
|
|
|
Cat wrote: | | Perhaps you should ask the forum owners, Archant, who provide and fund the forum? |
|
What an interesting comment. Have you by any chance read George Orwell?
My impression was that this was a site which invited open and fair debate about all things French and France with a particular bent upon UK people who live or aspire to live here. Are you saying that we must seek approval from Archant on what we discuss because they pay for the site?
I read the rules when applying and they say nothing of this. Provided a statement is fair, non insulting and so on it should be published.
Please could you clarify this for me and any others who may be confused.
I wonder how much the Director of Oxfam is paid... How many wells would that dig?
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
09/05/2008, 18:48
|
puppycloud
Joined on 09/05/2008
Posts 16
|
|
|
Russethouse wrote: | |
I think its great to have a balanced view, and thats the key word 'balanced'
Plenty of critical posts are allowed, about all sorts of things, there is a fine line between posting logical criticism and spamming !
|
|
And yet finer between moderation and censorship....
I wonder how much the Director of Oxfam is paid... How many wells would that dig?
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
France Forum » General Discuss... » The Complete Fr... » Balanced Forum
|
|
|
|