|
|
Driving
Topic has 208 replies.
 
 
|
|
Sort Posts:
|
|
|
|
18/06/2008, 7:59
|
P2
Joined on 13/09/2006
Posts 289
|
Re: Please help.......insurance quandry
|
|
|
|
|
Jacqui Too wrote: | |
Not wanting to be argumentative and I agree that on the facts we have been given Mr O has been badly treated and some kind of redress is needed.
I would just like to add that last month we came to France with our transit van to do some private work on our own house, and as the same as last year I had to go to our insurers (NFU) to get a 'green card' because it is a commercial vehicle and therefor does not have the required wording (green card) printed on the back of the cover note as does our car. I was asked by the insurance company if we intended to work while we were away in France as they could not issue one if we were.
So may be it's the same whether you drive a car or commercial vehicle you may not be entitled to work and drive on a green card! I might ask next time I am in their office what insurance we would need IF we intended to work, just for curiosity.
|
|
Jackie I think you are confusing commercial work, i.e. carrying out work for Joe Bloggs for payment and carrying out totally non-commercial work, i.e. on your own home.
You may have a commercial vehicle but surely travelling to and from your own home for whatever purpose is 'social and pleasure'.
To extend that whenever anyone drives from their UK home to their French one in a car and they will do some work on it then they require commercial insurance for their car.
The answer to the insurance mans question was 'no'.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
18/06/2008, 7:59
|
JMB
Joined on 22/03/2008
Posts 40
|
Re: Please help.......insurance quandry
|
|
|
|
|
Russethouse wrote: | |
Policemen are human and make mistakes, and I guess there have been lots of times that quite a few of us have cursed the police for not acting ( I wrote a long post about one such situation this afternoon, then lost it ) I'm sorry that Mr O was caught in this situation and if compensation is due, then he should get it, but on the whole I would rather that mistakes were made being over zealous, than not being zealous enough. (as long as firearms are not involved)
I feel safer that way...
|
|
It's a good job firearms were not involved. GMP don't do firearms very well.
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
18/06/2008, 9:07
|
Pierre ZFP

Joined on 12/11/2004
PdC(62)/Luxembourg
Posts 1,938
|
Re: Please help.......insurance quandry
|
|
|
|
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Remember, apples and blackberrys do NOT count towards your 5-a-day
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
18/06/2008, 10:14
|
Russethouse

Joined on 23/08/2004
Forum Moderator
Posts 10,081
|
Re: Please help.......insurance quandry
|
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of years ago I complained, possibly here, that a driver who was involved in a hit and run incident, badly injuring my god daughter was not pursued enough, the car owner was traced but merely said she had lent the car to someone and couldn't remember who (the driver was male) and the police let it go - unbelievable - the outcome was several years of stress and dealing with the MIB to get compensation.
In that instance, my opinion was that the police didn't do enough - I can hardly turn round and now say they are doing too much, something triggered suspicion and if a police officer is suspicious I expect them to act. Don't you ?
I am not saying that Mr O should not have his costs repaid, get compensation etc, of course he should, isn't that part of the system just as much as anything else ? But when we have thousands of uninsured and tax dodging motorists, drug smuggling and terrorist threats in addition, what do you expect the policeman to do? Just let a suspect go on their way ? Yes, the phone call could have been made, but I doubt if it's the job of the traffic police to do that.
If you want to live in a safe society there is a trade off, rightly or wrongly. If Mr O had been guilty of some offence, and had been let to go on his way then been involved in a fatal accident a few miles down the road, we'd all be saying how lax the police were. We can't have it both ways.
www.quimperclub.org
99
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
18/06/2008, 11:29
|
Jacqui Too

Joined on 23/08/2004
Shropshire / Dordogne 24
Posts 703
|
Re: Please help.......insurance quandry
|
|
|
|
|
P2 wrote: | Jacqui Too wrote: | |
Not wanting to be argumentative and I agree that on the facts we have been given Mr O has been badly treated and some kind of redress is needed.
I would just like to add that last month we came to France with our transit van to do some private work on our own house, and as the same as last year I had to go to our insurers (NFU) to get a 'green card' because it is a commercial vehicle and therefor does not have the required wording (green card) printed on the back of the cover note as does our car. I was asked by the insurance company if we intended to work while we were away in France as they could not issue one if we were.
So may be it's the same whether you drive a car or commercial vehicle you may not be entitled to work and drive on a green card! I might ask next time I am in their office what insurance we would need IF we intended to work, just for curiosity.
|
|
Jackie I think you are confusing commercial work, i.e. carrying out work for Joe Bloggs for payment and carrying out totally non-commercial work, i.e. on your own home.
You may have a commercial vehicle but surely travelling to and from your own home for whatever purpose is 'social and pleasure'.
To extend that whenever anyone drives from their UK home to their French one in a car and they will do some work on it then they require commercial insurance for their car.
The answer to the insurance mans question was 'no'.
Paul |
|
I think that you have miss understood my post![Smile [:)]](/cs/images/emotions/smile.gif)
We did say " 'No', we are only going on a personal trip" and we did get our green card. My point was that had we been going to 'work for gain' there would/may have been a different response from our insurers and it's that response I was curious about.
Jackie
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
18/06/2008, 13:35
|
P2
Joined on 13/09/2006
Posts 289
|
Re: Please help.......insurance quandry
|
|
|
|
|
Jacqui Too wrote: | P2 wrote: | Jacqui Too wrote: | |
Not wanting to be argumentative and I agree that on the facts we have been given Mr O has been badly treated and some kind of redress is needed.
I would just like to add that last month we came to France with our transit van to do some private work on our own house, and as the same as last year I had to go to our insurers (NFU) to get a 'green card' because it is a commercial vehicle and therefor does not have the required wording (green card) printed on the back of the cover note as does our car. I was asked by the insurance company if we intended to work while we were away in France as they could not issue one if we were.
So may be it's the same whether you drive a car or commercial vehicle you may not be entitled to work and drive on a green card! I might ask next time I am in their office what insurance we would need IF we intended to work, just for curiosity.
|
|
Jackie I think you are confusing commercial work, i.e. carrying out work for Joe Bloggs for payment and carrying out totally non-commercial work, i.e. on your own home.
You may have a commercial vehicle but surely travelling to and from your own home for whatever purpose is 'social and pleasure'.
To extend that whenever anyone drives from their UK home to their French one in a car and they will do some work on it then they require commercial insurance for their car.
The answer to the insurance mans question was 'no'.
Paul |
|
I think that you have miss understood my post![Smile [:)]](/cs/images/emotions/smile.gif)
We did say " 'No', we are only going on a personal trip" and we did get our green card. My point was that had we been going to 'work for gain' there would/may have been a different response from our insurers and it's that response I was curious about.
|
|
Jackie sorry if I misread your post but I think there is a difference here......
You have a van that I presume you use as part of your business. Mr O was driving a car to get to and from his business. A World of difference.
Paul
|
|
|
|
|
Report
|
|
|
|
|
France Forum » Living » Driving » Please help.......insurance quandry
|
|
|
|